Together, we can keep care providers safe, healthy, and caring for Nova Scotians. Learn more at safecareconnection.ca

In our September 2014 Newsletter

  • Facility Based Workplace Inspections: 2 Part Series
  • Workplace Injuries: Top 10 Injured Body Parts
  • Call for OHS Writers
  • Hazard ID Tools

To learn more follow this link

Article By: Christian Goudge, AWARE-NS Safety Collaborator
Effective hazard identification is a critical and significant foundational activity in a successful OHS program. We need to do it because OHS law says so but we really need to do it to protect the most important thing we have at work: our well-being. There are two ways to find hazards in the workplace: proactively seeking them out or waiting until they find us by causing an accident. All too often hazards are discovered as a result of someone getting hurt. In an effort to reduce workplace accidents and injury a recurring, proactive approach to identify hazards must be used. Monthly workplace inspections are an effective way to identify and control hazards and the safety committee plays a key role in this important activity.

Hazards found in the workplace generally fit into the following four categories:

  • Chemical hazards such as solvents, cleaning solutions and certain paints
  • Physical hazards such as heat, noise, gravity; this is typically the most common hazard found
  • Ergonomic hazards such as poor lifting techniques, poor work station set up and repetitive and strenuous tasks. Ergonomic hazards are the leading cause of injury in Healthcare in Nova Scotia
  • Biological hazards are very common in Healthcare and include blood borne pathogens and bacteria and viruses

Once the hazards are identified they must be controlled. The level of control must be proportionate to the level of risk and must be sensible. For example if poor patient lift and transfer techniques are identified as an ergonomic hazard eliminating, the patient, although effective, would not be a sensible control method. There are four categories of controls used to mitigate hazards identified in your inspection.

In order of effectiveness they are:

  • Elimination/Substitution such as removing the hazard completely or replacing it with something less harmful
  • Engineering controls such as process redesign, mechanical ventilation and physical barriers
  • Administrative controls such as rules, policies and warning signs
  • Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) such as safety glasses and N95 masks

This list of controls is known as the hierarchy of controls and should be used in the order above. Elimination or substitution of the hazard is the most effective method of control because it removes the hazard completely. When elimination of the hazard is not possible the goal is to interrupt the path between the hazard and the worker to prevent harm. All of the other control methods are designed to minimize the potential harm a hazard may cause however the hazard still exists. Personal protective equipment is the least effective method of control and must always be used in partnership with other control methods.
Regular hazard identification and control is not only and effective method of protecting everyone at the workplace but demonstrates due diligences and promotes participation in the internal responsibility system by involving Safety Committee members, managers and employees in creating a safe workplace.
NEXT: Part II of Hazard Identification and Control where I will share some tips and tools on conducting effective workplace safety inspections.


About The Author

Chris GoudgeChris Goudge is a Canadian Registered Safety Professional with over 10 years experience currently practicing occupational health and safety in the health care sector. Broad experience in developing, implementing and managing health and safety systems for mutli site, multi jurisdictional operations in manufacturing and health care with a focus on accident reduction, risk mitigation and development of a self sustaining safety culture.

Entry Deadline Friday, September 20, 2013

Think you’ve got what it takes to spot all the hazards in this photo? Give it your best shot and you could WIN! (prize value of OSH Goodie Bag $50)

(Click On Image To Enlarge)

HazardID5 resized
 

How To Enter:

Email your answers to [email protected] by September 20th, 2013
4 prizes to be awarded
Entries must be from Nova Scotia Health Care and Community Services sectors ONLY
 
Special thanks to Ocean View Continuing Care Centre who graciously allowed us to come into their facility in 2012 and do this photoshoot.

Article By: Christian Goudge, AWARE-NS Safety Collaborator
In part one we discussed the types of hazards and the types of controls to eliminate or minimize the hazards. In part 2 we will discuss how to conduct effective workplace inspections consisting of identifying the hazard, suggesting corrective action, follow up and documentation.
Regular workplace inspections are required under section 28(2)(e,f,g,h) which outlines the need to conduct, report, follow up and maintain records of workplace inspections. Regular workplace inspections are a great way to prevent accidents and demonstrate an organization’s due diligence by proactively seeking out hazards before they cause harm. Inspections are also an excellent opportunity to engage the Joint Occupational Health and Safety Committee (JOHSC) in a positive and very important function. Workplace inspections also provide an opportunity to further develop the internal responsibility system by engaging workers and managers in workplace inspections.
The process of conducting regular workplace inspections has many components; let’s take a look at each one:

What needs to be inspected?

It is important to consider the entire workplace when establishing what needs to be inspected. The main building is often the focus of most workplace inspections but it is important to inspect other areas as well. The outside grounds, parking lots and out buildings such as utility sheds or garages must also be inspected as these are great hiding areas for hazards.

When does the workplace need to be inspected?

The OHS Act tells us to regularly inspect the workplace; this is commonly interpreted to be monthly. The Act also tells us we must create a schedule for regular inspections. In some cases it may not be reasonably practical to inspect the entire workplace every month due to the size of the site. In these cases the workplace should be divided into ‘bite size’ sections and each section is scheduled to be inspected on a particular month. For example; if we take a large site and divide it into 6 or 12 pieces, each piece would be assigned a month on the schedule. It is important to mix up the scheduled months for each area as the hazards may change depending on the time of year. Maybe the parking lot is one of the areas to be inspected; this should scheduled to be done in a winter month and a summer month as the hazards found would be very different. Once we have allocated the months to each section of the workplace, we end up with a regular workplace inspection schedule that has the entire site inspected twice per year. The only part missing is who is going to conduct the inspection.

Who conducts the workplace inspection?

The OHS Act expects the JOHSC to participate in regular workplace inspections; the internal responsibility system encourages us to share the responsibility of safety with all workplace parties. So that sounds like the safety committee and everyone else should be involved in inspections. A great way to do this is to have each committee member pick the month and area they would like to inspect and commit their name to the schedule. Now the schedule has the area, the month and the person conducting the inspection established for the year. Post this on your safety board and review it every month at the JOHSC meeting. It is a good idea to have the committee member inspect a unit or area they do not normally work in. On the day of the inspection, the committee member should have someone that works in the unit or area accompany them on the inspection, or make arrangements in advance to have a manager participate!

What do I look for when conducting a workplace inspection?

The primary focus of a workplace inspection is to identify hazards that may cause harm to staff or property damage. Recalling the four types of hazards in part one: physical; chemical; ergonomic and biological, should help guide your inspection process. These hazards can be found in the environment itself and in the work occurring in the area. When you enter the area to be inspected, slow down; good inspections take time. Look around, up and down; there are hazards to be found everywhere. When looking around you should be asking yourself questions like: “what can hurt me here?”; “what could catch fire here?”; “what could I trip on here?”; “what incident reports have come from here?” and so on. It is always very helpful to talk to staff that work in the area, they usually know the hazards well. An important point to remember is if we identify a hazard during our inspection that we can fix right away ourselves, such as a broom lying across the stairs, then we need to do this!

How do we document the workplace inspection?

The method of recording the hazards can vary greatly; two of the most common ways are through the use of checklists or through an open form. Checklists are very helpful in guiding an inspection, especially for people with little experience in conducting workplace inspections. Checklists ensure a consistent approach to inspecting and makes for a fairly simple process. The disadvantage to checklist is that it can restrict the inspection to the items on the list and may not capture the hazards present if the list is not comprehensive. Open forms provided the flexibility to be used in all departments and they are non-restrictive although it does require a more experienced person to conduct the inspection. Using either method, a suggested corrective action must be included with each hazard identified and a reasonable due date to have the issue fixed. There are many inspection forms available and it is important to find the one that works for your organization. This is a great project for the JOHSC to take on!

What do we do with the completed form?

The work is only half done after identifying and recording the hazards discovered during the inspection; we now have to ensure these issues are resolved. The manager of the area is typically the responsible person and the one tasked to ensure the issues identified are fixed. A 30 day time frame to have hazards corrected is often provided and items not closed on the inspection by then should be moved to the JOSCH agenda and be captured in the meeting minutes. A copy of the inspection must go to the manager and the JOHSC and the results of the inspection should also be shared with the staff in the area. This is a great topic for your regular staff meetings!
With practice, inspections will become less arduous, more effective and will be a strong component to a successful OHS program.
For more information on Hazard Identification check out these resources:

  • The Aware-NS eCampus
  • Canadian Center for Occupational Health and Safety

  • About The Author

    Chris GoudgeChris Goudge is a Canadian Registered Safety Professional with over 10 years experience currently practicing occupational health and safety in the health care sector. Broad experience in developing, implementing and managing health and safety systems for multi site, multi jurisdictional operations in manufacturing and health care with a focus on accident reduction, risk mitigation and development of a self sustaining safety culture.

Article By: Heather Matthews, AWARE-NS OHS Specialist
Any guess as to the top 10 body parts injured in Healthcare and Community Services workplaces? If you were to ask anyone in these sectors what is the number one body part injured, most would get it right. Backs are the number one body part injured in all six groups (Hospitals, Special Care Homes, Nursing Homes, Ambulance Services, Homecare and Family & Social Services) within our sector. We have developed a chart of the
“Top 10 Body Parts Injured” for each of the six groups that make up Health and Community Services. Shoulder injuries are number two in all groups except Special Care Homes and Homecare, where Multiple Body Parts is their number two.
If we look at the top three body parts injured (back, shoulder and multiple body parts) they make up 69% -74% of all injuries in all six group except for Family and Social Services where their top three only comprise 57% of the body parts injured.
Although we have a huge range of workplace settings (facility based, mobile workplaces and client homes) within our sector the injury result outcomes are much the same. These statistics clear identity the problem but getting to the root cause is much more challenging. There are many factors that may lead to these injuries, one of which is hazard identification and elimination.
The level of hazard identification may vary greatly from organization to organization throughout our sector but most understand the risks that are leading to injuries within their own organizations. We may understand what the hazard is and the outcome results from the identified hazard but are unclear as to how to eliminate it. The inability to eliminate identified hazards that are identified is again a multifaceted issue. There are many contributing factors such as resources (human and mechanical), education, training and workplace culture.

What can you do?

  1. Hazard risk assessments for all units or work areas
    There are many links to tools are available in our current newsletter
  2. JSA (Joint Safety Analysis) perform a JSA for each tasked performed
    Four basic stages in conducting a JSA are:

    • selecting the job to be analyzed
    • breaking the job down into a sequence of steps
    • identifying potential hazards
    • determining preventive measures to overcome these hazards
  3. Review incident reports and near misses and follow through on corrective action
  4. Develop a continuous improvement plan with a focus on elimination of hazards

Top Ten Body Parts Injured By Group in Health Care and Community Services

top 10 body parts

About The Author

Heather Headshot WebHeather Matthews is AWARE-NS’s Occupational Health & Safety Specialist. She received her Bachelor’s degree, majoring in Housing and Facility Management from Mount Saint Vincent University (1989). In 2010, she completed her Certificate in Occupational Health and Safety from Ryerson University. Most recently was the Corporate Health and Safety Manager for Ocean Nutrition Canada a Global Bio Science company where she was responsible for the development and implementation of the Health and Safety program. Developing a strong safety culture though leadership, training and education has been her primary focus.

 
 
 

OEA has been engaging employers over the past few months in discussion about the WCB’s draft policies regarding Psychological Injury and Contactor/Subcontractor. For Employers who were unable to attend, there will be a new session scheduled. See below for details.for the upcoming consultations being held in September:

Thursday, Sept 19 2013

Employer Consultation re: WCB’s draft policy regarding Psychological Injury
Canada Post, 6135 Almon Street Confederation Boardroom, Halifax
10 am-12 noon

To Register Fill Out Registration Form

 
EXTENSIONS GRANTED FOR SUBMISSIONS
Recently, two draft policies were released by WCB NS and employers are asked to comment on them. The due dates for both policies have now been extended to October 31, 2013.
Psychological Injury – Workplace Stress – submissions now due on October 31.
Contractor/Subcontractor – submissions now due on October 31.
Information about both drafts can be found on our website at www.oeans.ca.
“Employer Consultations on Both WCB Draft Policies!”
Please see our website as a tentative schedule for further employer consultations is now available!
“Writing Sessions for Responses to WCB Draft Policies”
OEA will offer writing development sessions in September for company’s working on responses to the two WCB draft policies. See our website or call our office for more details. There is no charge to attend. Bring your laptop!
OEA Mail, Delivery and Courier Information
833 Sackville Drive, Suite 5
Sackville, Nova Scotia
B4E 1S1
Phone: 902.442.9366
Fax: 902.252-3466
For more events and information about OEA, visit our website at www.oeans.ca.

The consultation process will end on September 26, 2013

Please provide your feedback!

Throughout consultations for the Workplace Safety Strategy, concerns were raised by stakeholders related to the administrative penalties system. Earlier this year, an initial stakeholder consultation was completed to gather feedback on the proposed framework of the new system. This framework has guided the detailed development of the proposed new system.

The proposed changes to the administrative penalties system will be an important step to creating, promoting, and maintaining a culture of safety in all workplaces in Nova Scotia. Further detail has been developed in the form of draft changes to the OHS Act, draft administrative penalties regulations, and draft guidelines for issuing administrative penalties to support consistency and predictability in the new system.
A discussion paper has been provided to introduce and explain the proposed new system, with further detail in the supporting documents for your review and comments. You can find all relevant documents at the following link: www.novascotia.ca/adminpenalties.
The Discussion Paper At a Glance
The province’s goal is to make Nova Scotia the safest place to work in Canada. Nova Scotia’s government, employers and employees each have a role to play in helping us achieve this, and we have to act. Since January 2010, administrative penalties have been used by government as one of many tools to help promote and ensure workplace safety across the province. Some aspects of the program have been effective in ensuring occupational health and safety (OHS) laws are followed in our workplaces; however, we have also heard from employers and workers that some parts of the system need to be improved.
We heard the system was unfair and inconsistent, and at the same time, employers did not want to back away from ensuring safety in workplaces throughout the province.
A discussion paper was released in February 2013 outlining the proposed direction of the new system. Employer and employee consultations were held to gather feedback on the new direction, with written responses and stakeholder workshops providing insight into what a new system should look like.
This next phase of the review will provide insight into the feedback government received from stakeholders and outline the key changes being proposed to the administrative penalties system.
Overview of proposed solution
The discussion paper released in February outlined the high level framework of the proposed system. It suggested the administrative penalties system be a graduated system with three levels – education ,order, and penalty. This approach would also include a clear and consistent fine schedule and a streamlined appeal process to give clarity and predictability to stakeholders. This framework has guided the detailed development of the new proposed system.
An overview of the direction of the proposed system is shown below.
Education

  • Education on noted Safety issues
  • Collaborate with employers to help ensure compliance and safety

Order

  • During inspections, issue compliance orders without financial penalty for contraventions, with timeframes to comply
  • Issue administrative penalties for high risk contraventions or previously identified contraventions

Penalty

  • Issue administrative penalties for repeat instances of falling comply with previously identified contraventions
  • Issue administrative penalties for risk contraventions

Graduated System – Focus on educating stakeholders and enforcing the law through compliance orders before issuing administrative penalties.
Predictable System – A structured fine schedule that outlines penalty amounts for contraventions and how penalties will escalate with repeat
contraventions.
Simplified System – A streamlined appeal process for compliance orders and administrative penalties managed by the Labour Board.
 
Make your views known!
We want to hear from Nova Scotians, including stakeholders, employers, employees, citizens, and all other interested parties. To make it easy for you to respond and comment, we are providing the following 3 options to respond:
1) Through e-mail [email protected]
2) By providing a written submission to the following address:
Administrative Penalties Review
Department of Labour and Advanced Education
PO Box 697
5151 Terminal Road
Halifax, Nova Scotia
B3J 2T8
3) You are also invited to attend the last stakeholder session to provide your feedback on the proposed new system. The sessions will be held in Halifax on:
September 5 at 1:30 p.m. to 4:30 p.m.
Please identify if you can attend and what session you would prefer by emailing Craig Roy at [email protected] by Friday, August 16, 2013. Each session will take place at the Department of Labour and Advanced Education located at 5151 Terminal Road, Halifax.

The province’s goal is to make Nova Scotia the safest place to work in Canada. Nova Scotia’s government, employers and employees each have a role to play in helping us achieve this, and we have to act.
Since January 2010, administrative penalties have been used by government as one of many tools to help promote and ensure workplace safety across the province. Some aspects of the program have been effective in ensuring occupational health and safety (OHS) laws are followed in our workplaces; however, we have also heard from employers and workers that some parts of the system need to be improved.
We heard the system was unfair and inconsistent, and at the same time, employers did not want to back away from ensuring safety in workplaces throughout the province.
A discussion paper was released in February 2013 outlining the proposed direction of the new system. Employer and employee consultations were held to gather feedback on the new direction, with written responses and stakeholder workshops providing insight into what a new system should look like.
This next phase of the review will provide insight into the feedback government received from stakeholders and outline the key changes being proposed to the administrative penalties system.

Overview of proposed solution

The discussion paper released in February outlined the high level framework of the proposed system. It suggested the administrative penalties system be a graduated system with three levels – education, order, and penalty. This approach would also include a clear and consistent fine schedule and a streamlined appeal process to give clarity and predictability to stakeholders. This framework has guided the detailed development of the new proposed system.
To view the paper, please click on this link. http://novascotia.ca/lae/policy/docs/Discussion_paper_en.pdf

Labour and Advanced Education

July 29, 2013 11:38 AM

The province wants to get tougher on employers who put workers at risk, and promote education and prevention for less serious infractions.
This means fines for employers who break serious workplace safety rules or repeat offenders. For less serious infractions, inspectors will educate employers and employees to help ensure compliance with health and safety regulations.
Labour and Advanced Education Minister Frank Corbett today, July 29, released a discussion paper that outlines proposed solutions for administrative penalties, which are fines for employers and employees who break safety laws.
“We are committed to protecting this province’s workers,” said Mr. Corbett. “Hundreds of Nova Scotians have given us great ideas on how to improve the administrative penalty system.
“They want us to focus more on prevention, while sending a clear message to employers that there is zero tolerance for rule breakers who risk the lives and health of workers, or who are repeat offenders.”
The province launched a review of administrative penalties system after employers said that fines were issued inconsistently and, sometimes, unfairly. The review led to an approach that ensures proper education of workplace safety for employers and employees and assigns penalties for the right types of offences.
“We are very pleased to see the proactive stance of government on workplace safety in Nova Scotia,” says Rick Clarke, president of the Nova Scotia Federation of Labour. “Not only do we now have stronger workplace health and safety regulations and enforcement, but we also now have a strong emphasis on public education, which is key.”
Employers will have a clearer understanding of consequences. A structured fine schedule will outline penalty amounts for infractions and how penalties will escalate with repeat offences.
“As co-chair of the Minister of Labour and Advanced Education’s Occupational Health and Safety Advisory Council, I represent employers across the province,” said Harris McNamara, health and safety director at Emera. “Employers are depending on me to ensure their voice is heard. From what I’ve seen to date, it looks as though government has listened and that the system will be improved to become more fair and consistent.”
The new system also proposes a streamlined appeal process for compliance orders and administrative penalties managed by the Labour Relations Board.
The deadline for comments on the discussion paper is Sept. 26.
To view the full consultation package, visit
http://novascotia.ca/adminpenalties .

To view this release on the government of Nova Scotia website, please visit: http://novascotia.ca/news/release/

Click Here To Redeem!back to basics

Enter Promo Code 128520

Expires August 31, 2013
 
 
 
 
 

FEATURES

 
8 traitsSafety Managers Buttonquick links